Agnes de GarlandeEtà: 81 anni10551136

Nome
Agnes de Garlande
Nascita tra il 1055 e il 1120 15 15

Nascita di un figlio
n° 1
Simon de Montfort
tra il 1090 e il 1135 (Età 35 anni)

Morte di un nonno materno«Guy» II «le Rouge» … de Montlhéry
1108

Morte del padreAnseau de Garlande
1117
Morte di un maritoAmaury de Montfort
tra il 1137 e il 1138 (Età 82 anni)

Morte di una nonna paternaHavoise ??
tra il 1040 e il 1155

Morte di un figlioSimon de Montfort
12 marzo 1181 (Età 126 anni)
Morte di una nonna maternaElisabeth ??
tra il 1040 e il 1185

Morte della madre?? de Rochefort
tra il 1055 e il 1200

Morte tra il 1136 e il 1215 (Età 81 anni)

Famiglia con genitori - View this family
padre
madre
herself
Famiglia con Amaury de Montfort - View this family
marito
herself
figlio

Nota

http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/PARIS%20REGION%20NOBILITY.htm AGNES ( -after 1136). The ''Chronicon Mauriniacensi'' records that "Stephanu s Cancellarius" arranged the marriage of "nepti sua" and "Amalrico d e Monteforti", adding that her dowry was "honore de Rupe-forti" [Roche fort] [1]. The primary source which confirms her name has not yet bee n identified. Du Chesne suggests that the widow of Amaury [III] de Mon tfort Comte d´Evreux married, as her second husband and his first wif e, Robert de France Seigneur de Dreux [2]. He bases this on a charte r dated to [1 Nov 1183/31 Mar 1184] in which Philippe II King of Franc e confirmed the property of Notre-Dame de Colombs, including propert y "in loco Campus à la Drouë" donated by "Robertus comes de Drocis e t de Montfort" and "domum de là Nouë" donated by "Simon de Drocis i n sua ultima voluntate" [3]. Du Chesne´s argument is that Robert Seig neur de Dreux could only have been entitled to "le titre de comte de M ontfort, don’t le roy le rehausse" from "un mariage fait avec la dou airiere de la mesme comté". He also suggests that "Simon de Drocis" , also named in the same charter, was the son of this marriage. Ther e are three difficulties with Du Chesne´s argument. Firstly, Amaury [ III] de Montfort was comte d´Evreux not "comte de Montfort", a titl e which does not appear ever to have been borne by members of his fami ly. Secondly, the chronology is unfavourable for the widow of Amaury [ III], who was probably born in [1110/15] at the latest, to have marrie d Robert de Dreux whose birth is estimated to [1124/26]. Thirdly, it i s unlikely that Agnes would have given the name Simon to a son born fr om this supposed second marriage, given that she already had a son o f that name by her marriage to Amaury. In conclusion, the evidence o f the [1183/84] charter alone is insufficient to corroborate this marr iage. [1] ''Ex Chronico Mauriniacensi'', II, RHGF XII, p. 77. [2] D u Chesne (1631) Dreux, Dreux, p. 14. [3] Duchesne (1624), Preuves, p . 47.