“Albert” I de NamurAge: 70 years940–1010
- Name
- “Albert” I de Namur
| Birth | between 940 and 970 20 |
| Death of a father | Robert de Namur between 974 and 981 (Age 34 years) |
| Marriage | Ermengardis Carolingi — View this family about 990 (Age 50 years) |
| Birth of a daughter #1 | Liutgarde de Namur between 990 and 1010 (Age 50 years) |
| Birth of a daughter #2 | Hadwide de Namur between 1005 and 1010 (Age 65 years) |
| Death of a daughter | Liutgarde de Namur between 1005 and 1105 (Age 65 years) |
| Death | about 1010 (Age 70 years) |
| Title | Comte, de Namur yes |
| Family with parents |
| father |
Robert de Namur Birth: between 920 and 925 Death: between 974 and 981 |
| himself |
“Albert” I de Namur Birth: between 940 and 970 20 Death: about 1010 |
| Family with Ermengardis Carolingi |
| himself |
“Albert” I de Namur Birth: between 940 and 970 20 Death: about 1010 |
| wife |
Ermengardis Carolingi Birth: between 970 and 975 17 20 Death: between 1013 and 1070 |
|
Marriage: about 990 — |
|
|
21 years daughter |
Liutgarde de Namur Birth: between 990 and 1010 50 20 Death: between 1005 and 1105 |
|
21 years daughter |
Hadwide de Namur Birth: between 1005 and 1010 65 35 Death: January 28, 1080 |
| Note | http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/NAMUR.htm ALBERT, son of ROBERT [I] C omte de Namur & his wife --- (-shortly before 1011). Albert, Gisleber t and Ratbod are named as sons of Comte Robert in a charter dated 98 1 [1]. He succeeded as ALBERT I Comte de Namur. "Otto… rex" confirme d the privileges of Brogne abbey "in pago Lomacensis situm" by charte r dated 992 which names "comiti… Namuci Adelberto" [2]. His date o f death is suggested by a record, dated to 1011, of a monk from St Vaa st d'Arras dreaming of hell where he recognised "Albertum Namucensiu m comitatui" being tortured, the episode being incorporated into a cir cular letter from Richard Bishop of Verdun to all abbeys [3]. [1] Pir enne, H. (ed.) (1909) ''Album belge de diplomatique'' (Brussels), plan che IV, cited in Namur, p. xxxv. [2] D O III 92, p. 502. [3] Namur , p. xli, which quotes the text, citing MGH SS X, p. 382, in which th e passage does not appear. |